The pre-term parliamentary elections did not offer a clear way out of the political crisis in Bulgaria. The problem of the fairness of the electoral process has permanently entered the political agenda. A coalition around GERB-UDF and PP-DB and a GERB-UDF minority government so far seem to be the most likely alternatives to new pre-term elections.
The pre-election campaign in Bulgaria started with the expected participants and with unchanged inter-party relations. The conflict between the two wings of MRF is a leading political intrigue of the campaign. Attitudes about a continuing political crisis and a fragmented parliament dominate.
The pre-election situation in Bulgaria brings to the fore the problem with the registration of parties and coalitions. There are clear symptoms of a crisis of the party system, most clearly represented by the unprecedentedly violent internal conflict in MRF.
The unification of the left wing has a chance only if it quickly overcomes the post-Ninova phase and the agenda of the right wing.
Pre-term elections produced a fragmented parliament, unable to overcome the political crisis. The intra-party conflict in MRF becomes a major factor of tension in Bulgarian politics. There is a growing risk that the spiral of pre-term elections will continue.
The Bulgarian commitment to the cause of Ukraine in the war with Russia is increasing. The election campaign is going against the backdrop of revenge of the “status quo” against the “change”. A government with a leading role of GERB is the most likely alternative to more early elections.
The caretaker cabinet began work without clear political support and without its own authority. The election campaign was dominated by a powerful campaign to discredit the second political force PP-DB. The country’s leading political configuration is formed of the informal alliance between GERB and MRF.
Bulgaria faces early elections without a dominant dividing line in the political space. The risk of political chaos posed by the unclear constitutional framework has not yet been overcome. Public opinion is divided between everyday problems
and national fears.
Government rotation is turning out to be a complex process that will probably defy expectations of ease and speed. GERB hold the political initiative for the first time in 3 years. The opposition parties do not show the capacity to offer an alternative to the government crisis.
Preparations for a government rotation began with complex negotiations for a “package deal” between the ruling parties. The political debate is subordinated to the powerful political attack by MRF politician Delyan Peevski against President Rumen Radev. Suggestions for the non-alternativeness of the government majority fuelled expectations for new political projects.
The local elections did not produce an advantage to any party and did not question the government formula. Constitutional changes all in all increase political uncertainty. There is an ambition to monopolise the economic process within the triangle of
GERB – PP-DB – MRF.
The upheavals and scandals in the parliamentary majority arise mainly from the clash of partners over the future of the Bulgarian energy industry. The results of the local elections show that all the leading parties are suffering political damage from the current administration. The candidate for mayor of Sofia, Vanya Grigorova, has become a leading figure in the left political space.
The policy of the Bulgarian government increasingly falls under the control of GERB and MRF. The campaign for the local elections has begun with a clear dominance of GERB, but with limited public interest. So far, no one has questioned the current configuration of government.
The government is stabilising under the increasing political influence of GERB and MRF. The tension between the President and the government determines the political agenda to a very great extent. Disputes related to values, culture and history increasingly dominate the media debate and polarise society.
The trends of the political crisis in Bulgaria are continuing, despite the formation of a regular cabinet. Those in power are trying to legitimise themselves with a constitutional reform without clear content. The campaign for the local elections has actually already
started.
The most expected option for a government has been realised, but after scandals, eroding its legitimacy from the very beginning. The new majority seeks to achieve consolidation around two causes: geopolitical (support for Ukraine) and institutional (limiting the President). The problems in the judiciary dictate a significant part of the agenda of the Bulgarian parties and politicians.
Online platforms operate under an unclear legal framework, which is subject to minimum standards established at the national level. Existing national laws and regulations are in need of revision and update. Only a few European countries have made an attempt to introduce a regulatory framework for online platforms, addressing specific needs of the provision of services or relating to the working conditions of people working though platforms. The Project Mapping Platform Economy
sheds some lights on the complexity of platform ecosystem by providing visualisation of several regulatory aspects of platform work at the national level in over 30 countries.
The most realistic alternative to new pre-term elections - a government with the support of GERB and PP-DB - is currently in a state of deadlock. The assassination attempt against the Chief Prosecutor Ivan Geshev is a worrying sign for the international reputation of Bulgaria. The draft budget for 2023 highlights a new line of tension between the caretaker cabinet and parliament.
The early elections do not point to a clear way out of the political crisis in Bulgaria. The current dilemma remains: “an expert government with broad support” or new early elections. The nationalist “breakthrough” in parliament is serious and has every chance of growing.
The election campaign in Bulgaria has started against the backdrop of confrontational geopolitical interpretations. A battle for the first place is forming between GERB-UDF and “We Continue the Change” (“Produlzhavame Promianata” - PP) - Democratic Bulgaria, which does not yet look like a battle for government. The crisis of the Bulgarian Socialist Party is the main reason for the lack of an adequate social agenda in the country.
The failure of the 48th National Assembly has deepened the political crisis in Bulgaria. The political process is constructed as a clash between the “experienced” and the “good”, ignoring the social agenda. Conditions are being created for a Eurosceptic wave via the tools of direct democracy.
The confrontation between GERB and “We Continue the Change” dominates the political debate and continues to block talks on forming a regular government. The changes in electoral legislation are seriously undermining confidence in the fairness
of the elections. BSP are starting to lose the initiative for the processes in the left space.
The new Bulgarian parliament has begun work without a real dialogue between the parties about the priorities of a regular government. The dividing line between “status quo” and “change” no longer forms the structure of the political process. The debate on the membership of the Eurozone and Schengen includes the danger of a Eurosceptic wave.
The present report analyses different aspects of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Bulgaria in relation to gender inequalities and discrimination. It focuses on six key dimensions: labour market, poverty, health, education and childcare, gender-based violence and crisis response measures. The analysis shows a deepening of gender-based inequalities in the above-mentioned dimensions and suggests the need for policies for workplace protection against discrimination, for better public child care services and such that enable a more equal redistribution of childcare between parents. It urges for a fair redistribution of pandemic recovery funds, paying particular attention to the increased vulnerability of women, and to the intersection of inequalities such as gender, age and ethnicity.
Bulgaria has taken an important step towards energy diversification. The results of the parliamentary elections do not bring a lasting solution to the political crisis. At this stage, an expert cabinet, supported by GERB and other parties, seems to be the main alternative to more pre-term elections.
The pre-election campaign in Bulgaria begins under the circumstances of the dilemma for or against relations with the Russian gas giant Gazprom. The possibility of a long presidential rule is entering the political debate. For the second successive elections, the main political battle is shaping up to be between GERB and “We Continue the Change”.
Bulgarian-Russian relations are stretched to the limit with potentially serious repercussions for politics and the economy of the country. The political crisis in the country points either to a shortterm unstable cabinet or to pre-term elections in the early autumn. The tension between the President and the leading party remains a key axis of the political debate.
In the Bulgarian political debate, for the first time in the 21st century, the need to choose between Europe and Russia is presented as being of paramount importance. The government is failing to formulate a useful way out of its own trap with North Macedonia. The gas crisis is becoming established as a systemic challenge for Bulgaria, requiring political consensus and an adequate strategy.
Bulgarian foreign policy has become domestic. All topics of the political debate are broken up through prism of the country’s foreign policy dilemmas. The government is close to a state of blockage due to the rejection of a common strategy and a “policy of mutual blackmail” of the coalition partners. The conflict between the President and the Prime Minister is becoming a central dimension of the political process.
Аktuell hat der Krieg in der Ukraine mehr als 195.000 Menschen zur Flucht nach Bulgarien gezwungen, von denen sich etwas mehr als 91.000 dafür entschieden haben, in Bulgarien zu bleiben. Gleichzeitig hat unser Land keinen klaren institutionellen Rahmen entwickelt und keine Kapazitäten aufgebaut, um große Gruppen von Menschen, die vor diesem oder jenem Krieg fliehen, aufzunehmen und für sie ein würdiges Leben zu gewährleisten. Die Regierung in Bulgarien hat keinen Plan, wo und wie Geflüchtete aus der Ukraine nach dem 31. Mai untergebracht werden sollten. Das ist eine riesige potentielle humanitäre Krise.
According to data from the Council of Ministers, published on the official government portal in support of Ukrainian refugees, as of April 18th, nearly 195,000 Ukrainian citizens had crossed the borders of the country, and just over 91,000 had chosen to stay here, 35,000 of them children. The data published also shows that are over 50,000 Ukrainian citizens accommodated in hotels or state and local departmental buildings under the Program for the Use of Humanitarian Aid for Displaced Persons from Ukraine, which entered into force in mid March. This means that more than a third of the refugee flow from Ukraine has been taken in by Bulgarian citizens.
"Bulgarien gilt als das russophilste Land in der EU. Die Regierung hat den Krieg klar verurteilt, doch das Thema droht die Gesellschaft zu spalten." - Artikel von Dr. Boris Popivanov
The issue of whether to provide military assistance to Ukraine in the conflict with Russia has become a dividing line in Bulgarian politics. The social and economic policy of the Bulgarian government has been compromised as a result of the war and the crisis and requires new solutions. Trust in institutions and parties is diminishing without a clear alternative.
The war in Ukraine is a challenge for the ruling majority in Bulgaria, but also an additional opportunity for them to become stabilised. The division between Russophiles and Russophobes in Bulgarian society is not currently causing serious political and parliamentary confrontation. The inefficiency of the Bulgarian parties creates space for new political projects and populist mobilisations.
Bulgaria is moving closer to North Macedonia, but is still a long way from resolving the dispute. The government is stabilising with the ambition of the presidential institution for a key role. The crisis on the left wing is deepening against the background of strong social expectations in society.
Bulgaria is one of the countries with the most numerous Roma population. The National Strategy for Roma Integration contains many weaknesses that do not allow its implementation to lead to a real change in the state of Roma communities. This report contains a proposal for a possible National Strategy for Equality, Inclusion and Participation of the Roma and focuses on areas that the previous National Strategy had not advocated, or had implemented in an unsatisfactory manner - the equality of Roma
women, the diversity of the Roma community, and monitoring of implementation. Proposals for some of the already existing priority areas are also presented.
The two countries share a common history according to the 2017 bilateral Treaty of Friendship, Good-Neighbourliness, and Cooperation. This, however, turns out to be insufficient to unite policy and politicians. Two political parties sharing the same name on both sides of the border are at the forefront of the dispute on the historical heritage. Simplified to the utmost and rendered as practical as possible, the formula for exiting the impasse could be formulated thus: two neighbouring countries, both members of the EU, with a practically non-existent border between them, open to communion between citizens, businesses, and cultural institutions from both sides, where all disputes gradually grow ever less relevant, and where people do not confront each other.
The party system in Bulgaria is in a period of significant transformation. At this stage, there do not appear to be any insurmountable differences between the parties that are in talks to form a government. GERB and MRF will continue to find themselves in political isolation until they are reformed politically and ideologically.
Bulgaria faces a serious crisis as a consequence of the fourth wave of the pandemic. President Radev is favourite to win a second term of office. Even if GERB win the elections, there is little likelihood that they will form a government.
Bulgaria is entering a period of political turbulence. For the first time in the democratic history of the country, the elections for President and the National Assembly will be held on the same day. President Radev is favourite to win a second term. He continues to be the politician with the highest approval in the country. The next parliament is also expected to be highly fragmented, which will make negotiations for a stable parliamentary majority difficult.
Bulgaria entered an unprecedented political crisis following the antisystemic, antiparliamentary and destructive behaviour of There Is Such a People (Ima Takuv Narod - ITN). Political polarisation in the country has built a wall between the main political parties, which restricts opportunities for dialogue and finding a solution to form a Parliamentary majority. Third Parliamentary elections in slightly over six months push the state to a stalemate and to deepening the political crisis.
The bilingual (Bulgarian and English) collection is the result of more than a year of cooperation of the LevFem team, the Transnational Social Strike Platform, the international feminist network EAST - Essential Autonomous Struggles Transnational and the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Bulgaria. The publication reflects the social and labor struggles, strikes and protests of women, migrants, key workers and LGBTI+ people from Eastern Europe (but also beyond) in the context of the Covid-19 crisis.
Bulgaria, like most European countries, is also a ground for the development of far-right movements and organisations. Widespread stereotypes in today’s Bulgarian society regarding “others”, Turks, Roma, Jews, refugees and LGBT people are negative. However, there is also a different level of tolerance for such differences, with the Roma being the most hated ethnic group. Four main dimensions of value perceptions, which are usually considered to be the basis for far right
attitudes - ethnocentrism, racism, xenophobia and islamophobia and conspiracy belief - are the subject of an analysis prepared by Prof. Dr. Antony Todorov, based on an empirical sociological survey conducted in autumn 2020 by the agency AFIS. The data analysis was performed by Chavdar Naidenov and Stefan Georgiev.
Industrial relations and social dialogue are an important element of any modern society. This publication aims to analyze their situation in Bulgaria in 2020, taking into account two important circumstances - the pandemic of COVID-19 and the census of members of trade unions and employers’ organizations. COVID-19 has led to the loss of many jobs and a change in the way many employees work. The census is carried out once every four years and is used to determine the nationally representative organizations of workers and employers.
The early parliamentary elections held on July 11th were marked by a record low turnout. For the first time since 2009, GERB are not the first political force. After a poor performance, BSP remains the third force.
The caretaker government has set about its work actively. The main challenge facing the caretaker government is the implementation of fair elections. Electoral polls show that Slavi Trifonov’s party is gaining ground on GERB and there is a definite possibility that for the first time since 2009 the party led by Boyko Borisov will lose the parliamentary elections.
After the decision of “There is such a people” to return the mandate to form a government, there will probably be new elections. The risks for a possible caretaker government appointed by the president will be high in view of the economic crisis and problems regarding the budget.The frustration of thousands of Bulgarians who supported the protests last year will intensify.
GERB won the elections, but it could be a Pyrrhic victory and the party will probably remain in opposition. The surprise of the elections was “There is such a people”, which achieved second place. The election results show that citizens want significant change.
The holding of elections in the circumstances of an epidemic is a major challenge facing the country. At this juncture, GERB, according to sociologists, is the leading political force, but the government has exceptionally low levels of confidence, and this may bring about surprises. With a greatly fragmented parliament, forming a ruling coalition will entail the agreement of at least three parties.
The vision of this project is to promote discussion and cooperation of the Bulgarian Greens with human/gender/migrants rights and social justice movements, in view of launching a new progressive, humanistic, democratic and ultimately green ‘wave’ in Bulgarian politics. Such a wave should contrast and contradict the ongoing right-wing nationalist trend. This publication was intended as a discussion paper for enhancing supportive interaction between Greens on the one hand, and human rights’ and social justice movements on the other.
Analysis of the Annual Grantee Meeting of the Bulgarian Fund for Women. 2020 is a serious contender for a leading apocalyptic scenario, not only in the context of the global pandemic of COVID-19, but also in terms of the eternal theme of equality between men and women. The year started with a report by the World Economic Forum predicting that in just 99.5 years, women will be equal to men, although in 2020 they will lead countries such as Finland, Germany and New Zealand and occupy leading positions in the European Central Bank and the World Bank. And two months later the EU, marking March 8, announced that women in the Union are confronted by “... challenges, inequalities and threats in their daily lives: abuse and harassment, lower pay, fewer jobs and opportunities for professional…
Bulgaria has entered a difficult phase of the pandemic. The situation in the country in the winter will be complicated by the concurrence of three crises - health, economic and political. The political elite as a whole show more an opportunistic pre-election state of mind than a state approach and unity in seeking solutions to the crisis.
There are ever-increasing indications that in the forthcoming elections, all the major parties will base their campaigns on anti-GERB rhetoric. The organisers of the protests from the “Poisonous Trio”, the party of Slavi Trifonov and “Stand up. BG” united in order to form a common network of observers, which would be a guarantor for fair elections in the country. The conflicts in BSP are not letting up and this may lead to a negative impact on the party in the forthcoming elections.
The political crisis in the country is becoming deeper. The protests and the situation in the country have led to a reaction on the part of European institutions. Ninova’s victory in the internal party elections for leader of BSP will consolidate her position on the eve of the parliamentary elections.
Bulgaria has entered a period of political crisis and the protests, which are in their second month, seem set to intensify at the beginning of September. The move with the project for a new constitution is an attempt to gain time because Prime Minister Borisov will not get the 160 votes required in the National Assembly to take the step of convening a Grand National Assembly. Opinion polls indicate a fragmented parliament for the next election, with declining support for GERB.
The scandals involving Prime Minister Borisov have been causing further damage to the country’s reputation. Recent events have shown that a number of fundamental EU values such as the rule of law, freedom of speech and media, and the separation of powers have been severely damaged in Bulgaria, and the silence of the EU is not well received by democratic spheres in the country. Political upheaval is on the cards in the coming months, because the expectation is that revelations about the government will continue.
The end of the state of emergency has led to a normalisation of political and public life in the country. Bulgaria has serious
problems not only with the rule of law, but also with the freedom of the media, and it would not come as a surprise if a more acute reaction should follow from Brussels to Sofia in the medium term. The party system is facing new restructuring in the context of the upcoming parliamentary elections at the beginning of next year.
The crisis with the coronavirus has radically changed the political debate in the country. In May confrontation between BSP and the ruling parties is expected to intensify as the economic consequences of the crisis become more visible. At this stage, confidence in the government and Prime Minister Borisov is high, but the economic ramifications that will follow are likely to have a negative impact on the credibility of the government over the medium and long term.
The Bulgarian government has taken timely measures to curb the spread of the coronavirus epidemic at this stage. As a whole, the political elite is acting responsibly and in a consolidated manner, although there are also some instances of unnecessary exacerbation of tensions. The major challenges in the country, just like everywhere in the world, are not only related to the crisis triggered by the pandemic, but are yet to come during the inevitable recession that will follow.
The exacerbation of the political situation in the country in the first months of this year is due to the shift of political and economic strata in the country, with the new Chief Prosecutor Ivan Geshev being the main player in this process. The escalation of tensions between the president and the government shows that it will be very difficult to find points of agreement for dialogue between them. Tensions in BSP are mounting with regard to the upcoming internal elections, which will decide who
will be the party leader.
The EU Council’s report and European Commission’s Country Report Bulgaria do not shed light on other grave issues – endemic working poor, repression of unions, non-observance of the law, as well as widespread violations of human rights. The 2018 CCC country profile shows that the latter are widespread in the garment sector which has 130.000 employees. As a direct impact of this social crises in Bulgaria, family members of tailors and many other citizens emigrate in search of means for survival – and all too often end up doing other precarious jobs in Western Europe.
The series presents shifts and dynamics within Bulgarian political parties and the party system as a whole, thereby shedding light on the development of Bulgarian democracy as a whole and the challenges in the process of its consolidation.
The stabilisation of the eurozone is one of the big challenges Europe is presently facing. While in some states of the EU the euro is still considered to be a critical integrative factor for the European Union, in others it is seen as an unfinished project, whose internal trade and financial imbalances create international redistributions and political strains, which are hard or impossible to resolve within the realm of national policies. While different models for reforming the currency union are being broadly discussed, the fact that another six countries are supposed to enter this Union is hardly mentioned in the debate.
The victory of GERB in the elections enables the party to complete its governing mandate. BSP has made a breakthrough in some regional cities of the country, but it cannot yet be seen as an alternative for a ruling party. Nationalist formations achieved lower results after the division.
The upcoming campaign for the local elections will be extremely intense, and full of compromising statements and smutty PR.
After winning the European elections, GERB is embarking upon the election campaign with confidence.
The divisions in BSP after the European elections seem to have temporarily died down and the party is emerging relatively consolidated for the local votes.
The European elections confirmed the political status quo and showed that there is no alternative in which voters are wont to place their trust. The campaign of compromising others led to an ebbing of voters and has confirmed the tendency of lack of confidence in the political elite and political parties as a whole. Scandals related to apartments and guest houses once again raised the issue of corruption in power.
Bulgaria has de facto entered the election campaign with a noisy scandal around luxury apartments bought by people in power at low prices. This has led to a strong public response and has become the number one theme in the public domain. These events show that there will be an intensified election campaign with a focus on compromising situations and black PR, and European topics will probably fade into the background.
This report contains the main results and conclusions of a national sociological survey of Bulgarian youth, and is representative of young people aged 14 – 29. The research was organised, methodologically developed and funded by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation. For the second time after 2011 – 2015, the Foundation set out the goal of determining the attitudes of young people in different southeast European countries. In 2018, the survey has the advantage of being conducted practically simultaneously in ten countries (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro, Romania, Slovenia, and Serbia) and with an almost identical questionnaire, now providing for maximum similarity and comparability of data both at regional and chronological levels.
There are sizable Muslim communities in many of the Balkan countries. As a whole, the region is characterised by the moderate nature of the Balkan Islam and tolerant relations among religions. In the last years, however, wars and political confrontation have drawn new dividing lines within local societies on ethnic and religious basis. The actions of the “Islamic State” and the terrorist acts in Europe placed additional strain on the local Islamic communities. Available evidence confirms the fact that a sizable number of Islamic fighters in the Middle East originated from South-Eastern Europe.
The study measures the real effect of labour emigration on the Bulgarian economy through a research based on an original
econometric model, which helps assessing the effectiveness of measures to change this trend. When deciding what policies
to use, we will be able to assess the cost of the decisions and what extent of action the state can afford. The publication also includes a sociological research that defines the profile and motivational attitudes of potential economic emigrants. The results of that research provide an opportunity for policies to be developed for the prevention of labour emigration. In any case, such an approach would be more efficient and quicker to put into practice than a reversal of the flow of labour migration.
Although the demographic situation in Bulgaria has been a serious crisis for nearly 30 years, it has only been the subject of public debate in the last few years. However, the focus and the measures taken are not related to the most significant problems and this leads to a lack of results. Among the important objectives of the present study is to make a comprehensive demographic forecast related to populated areas for Bulgaria up to 2030 of the main demographic indicators, which will outline the picture in the near future, and on this basis propose concrete measures and policies to improve the demographic situation in the country. Also to examine and analyse successful demographic measures and policies in Europe and to look for ways to adapt and apply them in Bulgaria.
Political scandals in the ruling coalition lead to a gradual and constant erosion of electoral support for GERB and the United Patriots. Protests in the last few months have increased public dissatisfaction with the government, and it is obvious from all this that this trend will also continue in the coming months. Confidence in political institutions continues to be at a critically low level, which increases the possibility of substantial shifting in electoral layers as a new factor emerges on the political arena.
The start of the new political season saw ministerial resignations, indicating that a hot political autumn is expected. Events in recent months have shown growing instability in governance, to which ministerial resignations are hardly likely to be the answer. The crisis with the Commercial Register, the bankruptcy of the insurance company „Olympic“, and poor-quality road construction are the result of complex problems, which will continue to generate such crises in the future. An accumulation of such scandals can lead to a gradual erosion in the support of the government.
The Presidency of Bulgaria of the EU Council can be judged as a successful political, logistical and communication plan. The theme of the “Western Balkans”, which had long been absent from the highest European forums, was back on the agenda again. Despite the difficulties and challenges faced by countries in the region, the prospects for integration open new horizons related to solving a long-standing controversy. The solution to the dispute over the name of Macedonia that Skopje and Athens reached shows that dialogue is possible in the name of a common European future.
The political situation in the first months of 2018 was determined to a great extent by the political tension created around the ratification of the Istanbul Convention and the deal with CEZ. These two events moved the focus of public attention away from the start of the rotational Presidency of Bulgaria of the Council of the EU. Despite the political controversies, the Presidency has been running successfully so far. The government has focused its efforts on two main priorities - integration of the Western Balkans into the EU and bringing the relations between the EU and Turkey back to normal.
The report summarises an international conference, which gathered over 40 European and national policy makers, international and national experts, youth representatives and activists and over 40 young participants across Europe, the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. In theory, young people are supposed to have access to social protection, but in reality young refugees are often being denied of access to any social services and benefits. The recent migration crisis has also shown that European policies are inadequate in ensuring the rights of all young people in Europe. Youth organizations across Europe have turned out to be one of the main driving forces towards a better social inclusion and integration of refugees.
The payment for professional experience and labour service, more known as “seniority grade” has become subject to fierce attacks from Bulgarian employers’ organisations. While it the only guarantee that salaries will be augmented annually, albeit just a little, employers argue this system does not exist elsewhere in Europe. Although government does not support the employers’ organisations so far, under mounting pressure from lobbying, certain state officials have started to give in. We find that the Bulgarian model has many analogies in other EU countries and beyond. In fact, the majority of the analyzed country do have models of augmenting salaries and/or adjusting base salaries according to professional experience. Bulgaria´s model of seniority grade therefore neither stands isolated…
Far-right parties and parties with an inclination to extreme nationalism are gaining power in Europe rising xenophobia and racism. An analysis of the policies of the political parties and movements in Bulgaria regarding the identification of program initiatives against human rights, women‘s and minority rights and their active implementation in political and social life in our country is the first of its kind, not only in Bulgaria. The research involves different political parties, non-governmental organizations, academic circles and media representatives analyzing the role of these policies for violating human rights, creating xenophobia, racism and anti-feminism, and creating stereotypes about women, men and minority groups.
Varna Forum 2.0 Thinking Together, Conference Documenation
At the end of 2017 political tensions in the country intensified. The reasons for this are the increased confrontation between GERB and BSP, which led to a series of scandals, resignations and mutual accusations. All this could have a negative impact on the EU Council Presidency, starting on January 1st. Successful running of the Presidency is a major objective of the government and ruling majority.
Recent months will be remembered for the foreign political activity of the government. The good neighbourhood treaty signed with Macedonia stands out as a particularly big success. It had been postponed for years by the Macedonian side.
The new government, made up of GERB and United Patriots, seems stable at this stage. The participation in the cabinet of two co-chairs of the patriots is a guarantee for their close involvement in the country’s governance.
The political situation in the future will be determined by the election results. Bulgaria will soon have a new government that has been regularly chosen by parliament.
Knjaz Boris I Str. 97 1000 Sofia Bulgarien
+359 2 980 87 47+359 2 980 24 38
office.sofia(at)fes.deTeam & Kontakt
Sie sind an weiteren digitalisierten Publikationen der FES Bulgarien interessiert?
weiter
Three pivotal transformations are currently reshaping the world – green, digital and demographic. Intertwined, they will significantly shape the... weitere Informationen
Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and the resurgence of global authoritarian hybrid threats have focused the attention of the democratic community... More
The COVID-19 pandemic is a stress-test for future-proof EU policy making. Since its start, the EU defined resilience as the new compass to strengthen... weitere Informationen
Diese Seite nutzt Website-Tracking-Technologien von Dritten, um ihre Dienste anzubieten, stetig zu verbessern und Werbung entsprechend den Interessen der Nutzer anzuzeigen.
Diese Technologien sind erforderlich, um die Kernfunktionalität der Website zu aktivieren.
Dies ist eine selbst gehostete Webanalyseplattform.
Zweck der Daten
Diese Liste stellt die Zwecke der Datenerhebung und -verarbeitung dar.
Genutzte Technologien
Gesammelte Daten
Diese Liste enthält alle (persönlichen) Daten, die von oder durch die Nutzung dieses Dienstes gesammelt werden.
Rechtliche Grundlage
Im Folgenden wird die erforderliche Rechtsgrundlage für die Verarbeitung von Daten genannt
Aufbewahrungsdauer
Die Aufbewahrungsdauer ist die Zeitspanne, in der die gesammelten Daten für die Verarbeitung gespeichert werden. Die Daten müssen gelöscht werden, sobald sie für die angegebenen Verarbeitungszwecke nicht mehr benötigt werden.
Die Daten werden gelöscht, sobald sie nicht mehr für die Verarbeitungszwecke benötigt werden.
Diese Technologien ermöglichen es uns, die Nutzung der Website zu analysieren, um die Leistung zu messen und zu verbessern.
Dies ist ein Video-Player-Dienst.
Verarbeitendes Unternehmen
Google Ireland Limited
Google Building Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin, D04 E5W5, Ireland
Ort der Verarbeitung
Europäische Union
Daten werden gelöscht, sobald sie für die Verarbeitungszwecke nicht mehr benötigt werden.
Datenempfänger
Datenschutzbeauftragter des verarbeitenden Unternehmens
Nachfolgend finden Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Datenschutzbeauftragten des verarbeitenden Unternehmens.
https://support.google.com/policies/contact/general_privacy_form
Weitergabe an Drittländer
Dieser Service kann die erfassten Daten an ein anderes Land weiterleiten. Bitte beachten Sie, dass dieser Service Daten in ein Land, welches kein angemessenes Datenschutzniveau bietet, übertragen kann. Falls die Daten in die USA übertragen werden, besteht das Risiko, dass Ihre Daten von US Behörden zu Kontroll- und Überwachungszwecken verarbeitet werden können, ohne dass Ihnen möglicherweise Rechtsbehelfsmöglichkeiten zustehen. Nachfolgend finden Sie eine Liste der Länder, in die die Daten übertragen werden. Weitere Informationen zu den Sicherheitsgarantien finden Sie in den Datenschutzrichtlinien des Website-Anbieters oder wenden Sie sich direkt an den Website-Anbieter.
Weltweit
Klicken Sie hier, um die Datenschutzbestimmungen des Datenverarbeiters zu lesen. https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
Klicken Sie hier, um auf allen Domains des verarbeitenden Unternehmens zu widerrufen. https://safety.google/privacy/privacy-controls/
Klicken Sie hier, um die Cookie-Richtlinie des Datenverarbeiters zu lesen. https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en
Speicherinformation
Unten sehen Sie die längste potenzielle Speicherdauer auf einem Gerät, die bei Verwendung der Cookie-Speichermethode und bei Verwendung anderer Methoden festgelegt wurde.
Dieser Dienst verwendet verschiedene Mittel zur Speicherung von Informationen auf dem Gerät eines Nutzers, wie unten aufgeführt.
Dieses cookie speichert Ihre Präferenzen und andere Informationen, insbesondere bevorzugte Sprache, wie viele Suchergebnisse auf Ihrer Seite angezeigt werden sollen und ob Sie den SafeSearch-Filter von Google aktivieren möchten oder nicht.
Dieses cookie misst Ihre Bandbreite, um festzustellen, ob Sie die neue Player-Oberfläche oder die alte erhalten.
Dieses cookie erhöht den „Views“-Zähler des YouTube-Videos.
Dies wird auf Seiten mit eingebettetem YouTube-Video gesetzt.
Dies ist ein Dienst zum Anzeigen von Videoinhalten.
Vimeo LLC
555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, United States of America
Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika
Privacy(at)vimeo.com
Klicken Sie hier, um die Datenschutzbestimmungen des Datenverarbeiters zu lesen. https://vimeo.com/privacy
Klicken Sie hier, um auf allen Domains des verarbeitenden Unternehmens zu widerrufen. https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
Klicken Sie hier, um die Cookie-Richtlinie des Datenverarbeiters zu lesen. https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
Dieses cookie wird in Verbindung mit einem Videoplayer verwendet. Wenn der Besucher beim Ansehen von Videoinhalten unterbrochen wird, merkt sich das cookie , wo das Video gestartet werden soll, wenn der Besucher das Video neu lädt.
Ein Indikator dafür, ob sich der Besucher jemals angemeldet hat.
Registriert eine eindeutige ID, die von Vimeo verwendet wird.
Speichert die Einstellungen des Benutzers beim Abspielen eingebetteter Videos von Vimeo.
Wird nach dem ersten Upload eines Benutzers festgelegt.
Dies ist ein integrierter Kartendienst.
Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin 4, Ireland
https://support.google.com/policies/troubleshooter/7575787?hl=en
Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Singapur, Taiwan, Chile
Klicken Sie hier, um die Datenschutzbestimmungen des Datenverarbeiters zu lesen. http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/